Which educational policy is least likely to positively impact second language learning?

The use of standardized testing for all students is least likely to positively impact second language learning because standardized tests typically focus on a uniform set of academic skills and knowledge, often emphasizing rote memorization and basic comprehension rather than the nuanced communication skills required for language acquisition. Furthermore, these assessments may not adequately measure a learner’s proficiency in a second language, especially if they lack context-rich experiences that facilitate deeper language understanding.

While the other options promote elements that are beneficial to second language learners—such as recognizing diverse learning styles, incorporating cultural studies to provide context, and encouraging bilingual education to foster both languages—they create a more holistic educational environment. Standardized testing, on the other hand, can lead to a narrow focus on metrics that do not capture the complexities of language learning, ultimately hindering the development of linguistic and cultural competencies essential for mastery in a second language.